3 Radioactivity

The hypothesis of the nuclear destruction process with neutron collimator COMPLETES the theory of
William Tahil

It takes into account the statistical changes of the isotope signature caused by another interaction with neutrons.


Thousands of first responders in New York have been exposed to deadly radiation over the years.

Please consider making a donation for the increasing number of 9/11 cancer and radiation victims in New York.

EXTERNAL LINK: (NOTE: we assume no liability for the contents)

Decay chain of barium 143 and strontium 93

With the exception of the slightly radioactive zirconium, all primary fission products decay within a few days.

Isotopes of the primary fission products however might have longer half lives.

Source 1 (modified): http://www.nucleardemolition.com/
Source 2 (half lives): http://www.internetchemie.info/chemiewiki/index.php?title=Barium-Isotope

3.1 Checking the facts

Did the decontamination of Ground Zero prevent cancer?

The answer is correct. Thank you.
Unfortunately the answer is incorrect.

3.2 Summary

Radioactive experiments with their own civil population are not unusual for US powerholders.

Between 1945 and 1960, approximately 300,000 soldiers and civilians were exposed to radiation effects

KILLING OUR OWN: The Disaster of America’s Experience with Atomic Radiation

Source: www.ratical.org/radiation/KillingOurOwn/KOO.pdf

Local copy: pdfs/Killing_Our_Own.pdf

Photo (right): Borax Sedan; 104 kt, ignition in –194 m

Source 1: http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/photos/wtc1exp10.html
Source 2: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sedan_(nuclear_test)

Source: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sedan_%28Kernwaffentest%29

A considerable part of the US population (about 7 percent, that was equal to approx. 13 million people in 1962) was contaminated due to Sedan.

Just about 2 percent of the released radiation ended up in the mushroom cloud, the rest either fell back directly into the crater or onto the ground within spitting distance.

Nevertheless, (minor) radioactive fallout was still measured months after the event between Sedan and the vicinity of Chicago.

3.2.1 Previous knowledge of the CIA / blackmailing the coalition

The expected use of miniature thermonuclear weapons in New York

Before 9/11 former CIA employee Susan Lindauer was involved in the peace contract negotiations with representatives of the Iraq government.

In late summer of 2001 she got a personal warning by her superior Richard Fuisz: an urgent recommendation not to travel to New York because an attack with a thermonuclear weapon was expected.

Source @25’:30’’: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-iJPwW1ryOI

Richard Fuisz warning Susan Lindauer

Do not go back to New York City. It’s too dangerous.

We are expecting the use of a miniature thermonuclear device.

Susan Lindauer

And they were not afraid that I was going to be hurt by [by] falling debris in the World Trade Center. I wasn’t going to be in the World Trade Center.

They were afraid of radiation contamination.

    9/11 comprises two mysteries for the masses:

  • a physical one: the effect of nuclear weapons has not been understood yet

  • a sociological one: the extent of potential blackmail has not been understood yet

? Giulietto Chiesa ? (EU parliament member 2004 - 2009)

At a meeting taking place after the September 11 attacks a US general gave a speech. Suddenly he said that in reality Osama bin Laden was in possession of about 15 small nuclear weapons – and that he had already used them.

He then played back a video showing a gigantic mushroom cloud rising above New York that we watched flabbergasted.

The general then urged us to understand how important it was to build a ‘Coalition of the willing’: only together we could take action against Osama bin Laden to avoid mushroom clouds developing above European cities .

Asked whether we could make this video available for the public, the general denied our question: this was classified information.

Source: youtube.com; Link missing
Not to be referenced as source: http://www.voltairenet.org/article30048.html

3.2.2 Radioactive fallout and decay values

The large part of the dust particles was blown out to the sea, as a consequence the fallout in New York was relatively low.

Copy (page 6): www.911history.de/pdfs/World Trade Center USGS Chemistry Table.pdf
Direct access: pdfs/World Trade Center USGS Chemistry Table.pdf

Dust cloud of the World Trade Center, NEXRAD radar image

Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:New_York_September_11_NEXRAD.png
Direct file: images_oversized/ESS_USGS_map_overview_911nn040_grid_en.jpg

The uranium "fingerprint" of a nuclear weapon; Example: Little Boy Bomb

The 16 kiloton yield of the Little Boy bomb was produced by the fission of 0.91 kg of uranium-235, out of the 64 kg in the pit.

The remaining 63 kg, 98.5% of the total, contributed nothing to the energy yield.


Source 1: http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/chart/reCenter.jsp?z=92&n=143
Source 2: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Boy

1. Conventional explosive

2. Hollow uranium 25.6 kg "bullet"

3. Gun barrel

4. Uranium cylinder 38.4 kg "target"

    Both expected elements are present:

  • uranium: confirmed

  • thorium: confirmed

Copy: www.911history.de/pdfs/USGS_Leachate_Table_Uran_Zerfallskette.pdf

Source (direct access): pdfs/USGS_Leachate_Table_Uran_Zerfallskette.pdf

No analysis of specific isotopes were published by the USGS

An first, playful estimation

The result of total [radioactive] uranium is 1.9 kg.

The real values could be significantly higher due to dust particles blown over the sea.

Source: https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2001/ofr-01-0429/chem1/WTCchemistrytable.html
Local copy (page 6): www.911history.de/pdfs/World Trade Center USGS Chemistry Table.pdf

Fallout and pyroclastic flow

Source: http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/911/images/lg-map-aerial1.jpg

Significant decrease of radioactivity within a short time

Source (modified): http://nucleardemolition.com/

How to detect radioactivity with a camera


3.2.3 Enclosure of radiation and decontamination

Ground Zero was covered with fresh loads of earth at regular intervals, the fills were removed and replaced after regularly.

Water vapor rose still many months after the attack through the earth fills.

Source: https://www.facebook.com/911nucleardemolition/photos_stream?tab=photos_stream

Water sprayers fighting high temperature debris

These sprayers were also used to cool the high temperature debris before it left the site.

Several trucks were returned to the site for additional cooling because the law enforcement officers would not let them through the tunnels leaving Manhattan until they stopped steaming.

Source: http://911encyclopedia.com/wiki/index.php/World_Trade_Center_Hot_Spots

Decontamination works on Ground Zero were carried out by workers wearing full protective suits.

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-iJPwW1ryOI.

3.2.4 Stable iron isotopes

Stability of iron

In terms of nuclear physics, iron is the most stable element and is difficult to make radioactive even when exposed to strong neutron radiation.

Source (modified): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiation


A lot of iron isotopes do not provoke a signal in the Geiger counter.

This applies for Fe-54, Fe-56, Fe-57 and Fe-58.

Source: http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/

Neutron bombardment: how radioactive isotopes develop

Radioactive isotopes can develop when a stable element absorbs one or more neutrons as nuclear components while being bombarded with neutrons.

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nucleon

Effective cross section

The effectiveness of the neutron bombardment per area unit is described by the effective cross section, on a circle: σ = πr2

Source: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Nuclear/crosec.html

3.2.5 Neutron scattering on iron

Effective cross section of iron

Iron has outstanding properties to scatter fast neutrons.

Fast neutrons are rather scattered by iron and not absorbed. A new [and destructive] radiation mix develops in the process.

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron_cross_section

Effective cross section of water / hydrogen

Hydrogen (H-1) also has very good properties to scatter slow and fast neutrons.

The most important harmful effect of neutron radiation in living tissue is the elastic scattering on hydrogen H-1 (effect of a neutron bomb).

This property also allows the use of water as neutron moderator in nuclear reactors.

Massive scattering for slow and fast neutrons by iron

In nuclear reactors, water is used as moderator for neutrons (scattering on proton H-1)

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron_cross_section

Scattering of neutrons on hydrogen and on the water molecule

Source: http://www.nuclear-power.net/nuclear-power/reactor-physics/nuclear-engineering-fundamentals/neutron-nuclear-reactions/neutron-elastic-scattering/

3.2.6 Radionuclides in element analysis

Step 1: Fission

Probabilities of uranium splitting into two light atomic nuclei

Source: http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/chart/reCenter.jsp?z=26&n=30.

Step 2: Searching the radioactive decay chain after uranium fission

The "finger print" of a nuclear weapon: a certain mixture of radioactive elements

When set off, every nuclear weapon produces a characteristic mixture of radioactive elements that is based on the subsequent processes of disintegration.

Source: http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/chart/reCenter.jsp?z=26&n=30


Radioactive β decay of strontium93 after uranium fission

Source (modified): http://www.nucleardemolition.com/

Step 3: Collecting evidence

A few days after September 11 the USGS collected and analyzed dust samples from about 40 different locations.

Source: http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2001/ofr-01-0429/leach1/WTCleachtable.html

Local copy: http://www.911history.de/pdfs/USGS_Leachate_Table_Barium.pdf
Local copy: http://www.911history.de/pdfs/USGS_Leachate_Table_Strontium.pdf

Sampling points

Source (edited): http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2001/ofr-01-0429/chem1/index.html#Sampling
DOWNLOAD the svg file: www.911memorial4kids.org/svg/911nn040_en.svg

Step 4: Analysis

Analysis 1: official results; search terms: "Lanthanum", "Cerium"

The "nuclear finger print" for barium exists.

Source: http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2001/ofr-01-0429/leach1/WTCleachtable.html

Analysis 2: official results; search terms: "yttrium", "zirconium", "niobium"

The "nuclear finger print" for strontium exists.

Source: http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2001/ofr-01-0429/leach1/WTCleachtable.html

3.2.7 Neutron activation

The analyses do not take into account that the statistical distribution of the fission products may change due to rescattering of neutrons: for ex. a shift from strontium-90 to strontium-91 Neutron activation: example carbon

Carbon is a component of organic life, it is usually not radioactive.

Source: http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/chart/reCenter.jsp?z=6&n=8 Neutron activation: Example strontium-90

The isotopes resulting from uranium fission develop with a certain probability.

Probability of the formation of strontium isotopes

Source: http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/

Half-life of strontium isotopes

Source: http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/chart/reCenter.jsp?z=6&n=8 Potential absorption of other neutrons by already radioactive isotopes

Under laboratory conditions the resulting statistical distribution of radioactive isotopes can be predicted precisely, just like during an uranium fission.

Situation: few millionths of a second after the ignition of the nuclear weapon

Source: http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/

1. Probability distribution of isotopes after uranium fission (lab)

2. Rescattered neutron radiation

3. Center of explosion with the isotopes

4. Potential transition of strontium-90 to strontium-91 after absorbing a neutron Principle of neutron interaction

Report: http://www.nucleardemolition.com/files/Download/GZero_Report0.pdf

Photo: mobile nuclear weapon with 10 t TNT equivalent (without intensified neutron flux)

Source 1; photo on the left: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davy_Crockett_%28nuclear_device%29
Source 2 (page 29); drawing at the center: http://www.nucleardemolition.com/files/Download/GZero_Report0.pdf
Source 3, drawing on the right: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kernwaffentechnik#Neutronenwaffe

1. Casing of the ERB bomb

2. Nuclear fission explosive charge

3. Metal additives

4. Additional nuclear explosive charge (inexistent in the case of the Davy Crockett showh here)

Change of the isotope distribution

William Tahil’s approach primarily shows that multiple rescattering of neutrons may change the statistical distribution of fission products due to neutron rescattering.

The discussion about which elements actually had an effect on the nuclear processes – wanted or unwanted – is however pure speculation.

Prior to carrying out such an analysis, the rockbed below Ground Zero underneath the memorial pools must be examined for radionuclides.

Use of a pulsed run supercritically (according to William Tahil)

Video clipping from ’Burning cars near WTC 2 Before the towers fell’

3.2.8 The cancer victims of 9/11

by the end of 2016

Hypothetical radiation exposure on September 11, 2001

Source (modified): http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/collapses/mushrooming.html

Hypothetical radiation exposure as of September 21, 2001

Source (600% factor after reduction: 25%): http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/wtc/images/wtc-photo.jpg

Kyle Kulinski: The Gulf War Symptoms of 9/11

Source @00’:58’’: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p9p4knPmXYc

Impact of the radioactive hot spots: Gulf war syndrome

Source 1: http://www.renew911health.org/
Source 2: http://911encyclopedia.com/wiki/index.php/World_Trade_Center_Hot_Spots

Entering the cauldron

Source: http://www.abidemiracles.com/images/terrorism/911nukes/010915wtc2subbasemt.jpg

Impact of other substances: Asbestos and toxic vapors

There are additional cancers in New York caused by asbestos dust.

Asbestos acts mechanically as carcinogen – by constantly irritating the pulmonary alveoli and thus causes cancer.

renew911health.org: The Act

Interview with John Devlin

JD@02:45: So the compensation is not just for me, the compensation for my family [...].

What about my kids, what about the other responders’ kids? If I had all this toxicity on me and I wake up with cancer eight or ten years later, do I get my kids sick?

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQL9CAlGSow

Previous knowledge of authorities: FEMA report 1997

The FEMA report issued in August 1997 already pointed out that the WTC might be the target of potential attacks.

It also warns of the consequences of highly carcinogenic radioactive radiation.

Source (page 11 / page 15; FEMA): https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/Photocopy/189722NCJRS.pdf
Estimated number of unregistered cancer victims: http://edition.presstv.ir/detail.fa/359423.html

3.3 Photo gallery

Source 1: https://www.facebook.com/911nucleardemolition/photos_stream?tab=photos_stream

Source 2: http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/photos/index.html

3.4 References


Quelle: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQL9CAlGSow

  • The Cancer Victims of 9/11

9/11 first responders are getting sick and dying from cancer at an unusually high rate, but their illnesses are not covered by the James Zadroga 9/11 Health and Compensation Act. At first they excluded Cancer from the bill.

@ 00:23: story of John McNamara; died August 9, 2009, colon cancer

@ 05:22: story of Greg Quibell; died August 27, 2008, leukemia

@ 15:38: story of John Devlin (FDNY); diagnosed with throat cancer

@ 21:08: story of Jeff Strohlein (FDNY); diagnosed with brain cancer

ShortClip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VHZMPV4ijxk


Quelle: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P91flfvdpTw

  • 9/11 Cancers Killing First Responders | Think Tank

Abby Martin talks to John Feal, founder and president of the Feal Good Foundation.

@ 00:45: John Feal talks about the different wave of cancers.


    • radiation induced aggresive cancers are leukemia, brain cancer, bone cancer, throat cancer (first 15 years)

    • asbestos induced cancers are lung cancers (after 15 years, up to 30 years)

ShortClip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyK9R76qwm4


Quelle: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yqYmrUiIev8

  • A Farewell Walk To ’Ground Zero’ by a NYC Downtown Native Hours After

The nuclear war zone of the World Trade Center on 9/11.

@ 01:36: firefighters in the smoke (at 11 a.m.)

@ 02:18: paper and printing in good condition on top of steel powder

@ 04:08: new explosion triggered in the background

@ 04:16: direct view of the results of the muzzle flash (out of the earth)

@ 06:07: the towers as steel powder in the street, engine 59 driving by, with a dust trail behind

ShortClip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hEaD5xieg3o


Quelle: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-iJPwW1ryOI

  • WTC Ground Zero Decontamination

Decontamination of trucks and streets.

@ 01:11: extensive cleaning / decontamination of a truck

@ 01:58: extensive cleaning / decontamination of the street and vehicles

@ 03:28: checkpoints and documentation of decontamination

ShortClip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H01ajvw9Dos


Quelle: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j4ZgHYrxFx8

  • Unfiltered 9/11 Footage | Hoboken, NJ & Manhattan

The nuclear war zone of the World Trade Center on 9/11.

@ 04:16: soldiers of the National Guard in filter masks

@ 05:45: workers of the Nation Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) putting on protection suits

ShortClip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d8MrbwKKLJM


Quelle: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lFZ8UcMgucY

  • Radiological Cleanup on Ground Zero

The Nation Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) at work during the massive radiological decontamination effort at Ground Zero.

@ 01:13: members of the NNSA with full protection next to normal construction workers without any protection against radiation

ShortClip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hsu-qGeEJro


Quelle: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p9p4knPmXYc

  • 9/11 Heroes Die Of Cancer On The Same Day

Kyle Kulinski on Secular Talk exposes the hypocrisy of the the government which would prefer to exclude cancer from the bill (Zadroga Act), just leaving the first responders to die.

@ 00:08: in memory of the cancer victims of 9/11

@ 00:58: the epedemic of cancer in southern Manhattan

@ 01:42: like the gulf war symptoms [depleted uranium]

@ 01:55: congress at firsts blocked the bill

@ 02:38: taking the first responders to Cuba to force congress to pass the bill

@ 04:16: do you have any idea what it takes to do what they did?

ShortClip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rJf3-cpHmxw


Quelle: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JRcxnwGA3L8

  • 9/11: Firefighters at Ground Zero

Intact paper and steel dust.

@ 00:50: the first responders walking into the radioactive pit

@ 01:11: a line of first responders walking towards Ground Zero

ShortClip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GpDBWWnnkk0


Quelle: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kPcUrbOhghM

  • 9/11 The Third Truth – Dimitri Khalezov

Dimitri Khalezov explains the nuclear destruction with easy to understand scetches as well as the cause of the different cancer waves.

@ 1:48:45: "when we talked about the so called safe distance for detonating a 150 kt nuclear charge it was ... 500 metres."

ShortClip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=petmmuY2rL0


Quelle: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1dPvjvhXSZ0

  • President Bush Tells UN We Cannot Tolerate Outrageous 9/11 Conspiracy Theories

On November 10, 2001 President Bush told the United Nations:.

@ 18:58: "We must speak the truth about terror. Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September the 11th; malicious lies that attempt to shift the blame away from the terrorists, themselves, away from the guilty."

@ 23:22: "We have no other choice, because there is no other peace. We did not ask for this mission. Yet there is honor in history’s call."

ShortClip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NFnltGy-XeI

Published under 'U.S. Code Title 17 section 107: FAIR USE Act'. The views expressed in this article are those of the author only.

Top of Page