Во время руководства Дова Закхейма из оборонного бюджета в Пентагоне пропали 2,6 триллиона долларов
Растрату озвучил Дональд Рамсфельд 10 сентября 2001 года. На следующий день офисы следователей в здании Пентагона были уничтожены взрывами.
ССЫЛКА НА ВНЕШНИЙ РЕСУРС: (ПРИМЕЧАНИЕ: мы не несем ответственности за содержание материалов на внешних ресурсах)
В здании Пентагона можно выделить две зоны событий:
Зона 1 (слева): V-образные следы сажи от огня на фасаде
перед ними заметная груда мусора
Зона 2 (справа): обрушившийся фасад
Знаете ли вы, что комплексные учения были проведены в Пентагоне на случай возможной авиакатастрофы почти за год до событий 11 сентября, а именно 24 октября 2000?
Через несколько секунд из круглой дыры размером около 5 м вылетел огненный шар.
Спустя несколько минут фасад все еще стоит, за клубами дыма видна круглая дыра.
Зона 1 (слева): все обломки принадлежат маленькому самолету и были найдены исключительно на находящейся в 50 метрах от здания вертолетной площадке (башня вертолетной площадки видна у самого левого края)
Зона 2 (справа): фасад был разрушен первой волной взрыва.
Виден стоящий и окутанный дымом фасад
Разрушенный, горящий объект на вертолетной площадке.
Пожары внутри здания и горящие части разрушенного объекта рядом с автомобилем на вертолетной площадке
Обломки самолета сосредоточены только перед самой башней вертолетной площадки.
Знаете ли вы, что объект разлетелся на мельчайшие осколки, которые покрыли траву – и все они находились на вертолетной площадке?
Знаете ли вы, что найденные на вертолетной площадке обломки принадлежали самолету Douglas A-3 Skywarrior?
Знаете ли вы, что найденные на вертолетной площадке обломки можно идентифицировать как части хвостового оперения маленького самолета?
Подробное описание подготовки Douglas A-3 Skywarrior для подобной операции доступно в PDF.
ССЫЛКА НА ВНЕШНИЙ РЕСУРС: (ПРИМЕЧАНИЕ: мы не несем ответственности за содержание материалов на внешних ресурсах)
Части самолета на траве.
Знаете ли вы, что взлетевшие вверх обломки (видны на видео) были найдены в «неправильном» месте на крыше здания вблизи вертолетной площадки?
Стенограмма словесной дуэли между депутатом Синтией Маккинни, министром обороны Дональдом Рамсфельдом, начальником штаба Ричардом Майерсом и финансовым контролером Тиной Джонас, 11 марта 2005 года
CMK: Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney (D-GA)
DR: Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld
RM: Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Richard Myers
TJ: Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) Tina Jonas
DH: Chairman Representative Duncan Hunter (R-CA)
Sec. of Defense Rumsfeld in House Hearing on FY06 Dept. of Defense Budget
Chairman Representative Duncan Hunter (R-CA) and witnesses Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and JCS Chairman General Richard Myers hold a House Hearing on the FY 2006 Budget for the Department of Defense and Military Services.
«CMK: Thank you Mr. Chairman. Mr. Secretary, I watched President Bush deliver a moving speech at the United Nations in September 2003, in which he mentioned the crisis of the sex trade.
The President called for the punishment of those involved in this horrible business. But at the very moment of that speech, DynCorp was exposed for having been involved in the buying and selling of young women and children.
While all of this was going on, DynCorp kept the Pentagon contract to administer the smallpox and anthrax vaccines, and is now working on a plague vaccine through the Joint Vaccine Acquisition Program. Mr. Secretary, is it [the] policy of the U.S. Government to reward companies that traffic in women and little girls?
That's my first question. My second question, Mr. Secretary: according to the Comptroller General of the United States, there are serious financial management problems at the Pentagon, to which Mr. Cooper alluded.
Fiscal Year 1999: $2.3 trillion missing.
Fiscal Year 2000, $1.1 trillion missing.
And DoD is the number one reason why the government can't balance its checkbook. The Pentagon has claimed year after year that the reason it can't account for the money is because its computers don't communicate with each other.
My second question, Mr. Secretary, is who has the contracts today, to make those systems communicate with each other? How long have they had those contracts, and how much have the taxpayers paid for them?
Finally Mr. Secretary, after the last Hearing, I thought that my office was promised a written response to my question regarding the four wargames on September 11th. I have not yet received that response, but would like for you to respond to the questions that I've put to you today.
And then I do expect the written response to my previous question – hopefully by the end of the week.»
«DR: Thank you, Representative. First, the answer to your first question is, is, no, absolutely not, the policy of the United States Government is clear, unambiguous, and opposed to the activities that you described. The second question –»
«CMK: Well how do you explain the fact that DynCorp and its successor companies have received and continue to receive government contracts?»
«DR: I would have to go and find the facts, but there are laws and rules and regulations with respect to government contracts, and there are times that corporations do things they should not do, in which case they tend to be suspended for some period; there are times then that the - under the laws and the rules and regulations for the - passed by the Congress and implemented by the Executive branch - that corporations can get off of - out of the penalty box if you will, and be permitted to engage in contracts with the government. They're generally not barred in perpetuity -»
«CMK: This contract – this company – was never in the penalty box. If you could proceed to my second question, please.»
«DR: The second question – I've forgotten what the second question was.»
«CMK: I think Ms. Jonas knows it.»
«TJ: Thank you Ms. McKinney. I appreciate the question and I appreciate your interest in our Department's financial condition. We are working very hard on that program. I've just come back, recently –»
«CMK: I understand that you're working hard on it, but my question was who has the contract? How long have they had that contract, and how much money have we spent on it?»
«TJ: There are – In general we spend about $20 billion dollars in the Department on information technology systems. The accounting systems are part of that. I can get you the exact number for the record, of what we spend on our current, what we call "legacy systems," and those that we're moving toward.»
«CMK: And who has the contract?»
«TJ: That would be a multitude of individuals that have –»
«CMK: Could you name some, please?»
«TJ: Well, I think of the top of the, off the top of my head, well, I would rather not; I'd rather provide that for the record.»
«CMK: That's not privileged information, is it?»
«TJ: I'm sure it's not.»
«CMK: Well, please. We still have time, so, please.»
«TJ: I would be glad to provide for the record; I don't want to talk from the top of my head and be incorrect.»
«DR: On your first question, I'm advised by DR. Chu that it was not the corporation that was engaged in the activities you characterized but I'm told it was an employee of the corporation, and it was some years ago in the Balkans that that took place.»
«CMK: It's my understanding that it continues to take place, and that –»
«DR: Is that right?»
«DR: Well if you can give me information to that effect, we will -»
«CMK: I'm sure you are interested in all of the information that I have and I'll be more than happy to provide it to you.»
«DR: Good. Thank you.»
«CMK: But I would also like to get information from you, for example, the information that I just requested about who has those contracts.»
«DH: Let me assure the gentlelady that we'll make sure that this exchange of information takes place and that, Mr. Secretary if you can get back with us on the DynCorp -»
«DR: We will -»
«DH: - story, we'll get that to the gentlelady.»
«CMK: Thank you, Mr. Chairman.»
«DR: We'll get back on both of the first two questions but the Congresswoman has raised the other question twice now, and I'd like to have general Myers respond, because you mentioned it in the last Hearing and I think it'd be helpful to get the answer even though we're on red, if you don't mind, Mr. Chairman?»
«DH: General Myers, go right ahead.»
«CMK: But I would like to have the answer in writing as well, as I thought my office was promised.»
«RM: Okay I don't know about the promise, Congresswoman, but could you repeat the question to make sure I'm answering the right question; this is a 9/11 question.»
«CMK: The question was, we had four wargames going on on September 11th, and the question that I tried to pose before the Secretary had to go to lunch was whether or not the activities of the four wargames going on on September 11th actually impaired our ability to respond to the attacks.»
«RM: The answer to the question is no, it did not impair our response, in fact General Eberhart who was in the command of the North American Aerospace Defense Command as he testified in front of the 9/11 Commission I believe – I believe he told them that it enhanced our ability to respond, given that NORAD didn't have the overall responsibility for responding to the attacks that day. That was an FAA responsibility.
But they were two CPXs; there was one Department of Justice exercise that didn't have anything to do with the other three; and there was an actual operation ongoing because there was some Russian bomber activity up near Alaska. So we –»
«CMK:Let me ask you this, then: who was in charge of managing those wargames?»
«DH: General, why don't you give the best answer that you can here in a short a period of time and we'll - the gentlelady wants to get a written answer anyway, and then we can move on to other folks.»
«RM: The important thing to realize is that North American Aerospace Defense Command was responsible. These are command post exercises; what that means is that all the battle positions that are normally not filled are indeed filled; so it was an easy transition from an exercise into a real world situation. It actually enhanced the response; otherwise, it would take somewhere between 30 minutes and a couple of hours to fill those positions, those battle stations, with the right staff officers.»
«CMK: Mr. Chairman, begging your indulgence, was September Eleventh declared a National Security Special Event day?»
«RM: I have to look back; I do not know. Do you mean after the fact, or»
«CMK: No. Because of the activities going on that had been scheduled at the United Nations that day.»
«RM: I'd have to go back and check. I don't know.»
Bob Pugh: "In my video I show a clear view of the hole minutes before the collapse."
@ 00:12: burning front of the Pentagon, front intact (zone 2)
@ 00:45: live saving efforts
@ 01:10: debris and destruction at the heliport (zone 1)
@ 01:54: firefighters trying to bring the fire under control, front intact, hole visible (zone 2)
@ 03:08: special forces arriving with stretchers, people gathering in front of an object at the heliport (zone 1)
Video by Tech Sgt. Robert Stenberg – 11th Communications Squadron
@ 01:11: extinguishing fire at the heliport
@ 01:57: extinguishing fire at the "impact hole" and the transformer
@ 02:55: collapse of the outer wall of the pentagon
@ 11:36: at the heliport
Video by: unknown
Barbara Honegger's presentation [...] on what happened and what didn't happen at the Pentagon on September 11, 2001.
@ 00:30:00: The Story of the heliport (zone 1)
@ 01:32:30: The Explosions and the blast hole (zone 2)
@ 02:14:50: The philosophy and the core behind the operation plot
@ 02:24:50: General Wesley Clark: ’The New American Century’
The next day the Accounting offices in the Pentagon were blown up.
@ 00:08: "According to some estimates we cannot track 2.3 Trillion dollars in transactions"
Representative Cynthia McKinney questioning Donald Rumsfeld about the missing 2.3 Trillion dollars.
@ 17:46: "A brief ray of hope...during the house hearings..."
@ 18:18: "... the crisis of the sex trade ... the buying and selling of young women and children. While all of this was going on DynCorp kept the Pentagon contract ..."
@ 19:09: Q1: "Mr. Secretary, is it policy of the US government to reward companies that traffic in women and little girls?"
@ 19:12: Q2: "According to the Comptroller General of the United States, there are serious financial management problems at the Pentagon... fiscal year 1999: 2.3 Trillion missing... fiscal year 2000: 1.1 Trillion missing. [...]"
"The Pentagon has claimed year after year that the reason it can’t account for the money is because it’s computer don’t communicate with each other [...] Who has the contracts today to make those systems communicate with each other?"
A brilliant analysis of the disease modern society is suffering.
@ 00:00:30: Chris Hedges: "In celebrity culture we destroy what we worship."
Money is the key of the whole thing. The Money plot of the Private Banks.
@ 00:14:02: Benjamin Franklin wrote: "The colonies would gladly have borne the little tax on tea and other matters had not it been that England took away from the colonies their money, which created unemployment and dissatisfaction."
@ 00:29:35: "Union Banking Cooperation was another american Bank out in Chicago that was very instrumental in laundering nazi money, providing funds to the nazis."
"And guess who the director of Union Banking Cooperation was that was in charge of that: Prescott Bush. The grandfather of George W. Bush and father of George [...] Bush."
@ 00:47:08: "The rich party is still in power, and they are going to stay in power as long as they can control the masses and this is why you will never hear an american politician today refer to the Republic. Because we are no longer a Republic. We are an empire.
@ 01:26:35: "We need to do away with The Patriot Act which is nothing more than an updated Version of Hitler’s Enabeling Act"
Speaking the message of constitutional government.
@ 08:10: "... the states still retained all of their jurisdiction and authority. And as Thomas Jefferson said ’The states are free and independent’."
@ 21:20: "... I would encourage every police officer and every military man [...] to become part of The Oathkeepers.[...] We are going to stand for the constitution."
@ 27:57: "... I think it is a mistake [...] to trust any of these major television News Networks"
@ 36:56: "They have reached the point in the evolution of all this globalism. that they really are not trying to hide it all that much anymore"
@ 37:14: "It think that [...] the Clintons and the Bush families are involved in many dubious and sinister activities"
@ 45:26: "It is a battle for the independence of our states, the sovereignty of our states, the sovereignty of our country, the rights and liberties of our citizenry against an emergening New World Order [...]"
@ 45:45: "A cabal of people that really do despise our form of government and really do want to eradicate the principles of freedom upon which it was established. This is not a battle between left and right."
Published under 'U.S. Code Title 17 section 107: FAIR USE Act'. The views expressed in this article are those of the author only.